Philip Lake reviews WesTechs EvenFlo™ feedwell design for the even distribution of the feed slurry in order to provide the end user with the most economical thickener in terms of reagent consumption and size.
Gravity thickeners concentrate suspended solids in minerals slurries. These slurries typically are introduced at the center of the tanks and allowed to thicken to the desired density. A key component of any thickener is the feedwell, which has the following functions:
• Control energy and momentum dissipation
• Feed de-aeration
• Feed dilution (if required)
• Optimize flocculation conditions
• Evenly distribute the feed stream into the thickener.
It is critical to introduce the incoming thickener feed in an even and concentric manner in order to overcome short circuiting of fine unsettled solids into the overflow launder.
In the past, uneven distribution and the related short circuiting of unsettled solids were overcome by adding more flocculent or providing larger sedimentation vessels. Both have had significant cost implications. Uneven distribution of the feed into the thickener also results in the uneven deposition of coarse solids leading to island formation on the thickener floor. As a consequence the rake arm gets bogged down in this area with the resultant torque spikes being encountered by the thickener drive.
WesTech developed an improved system, method and/or apparatus for the even distribution of the feed slurry in order to provide the end user with the most economical thickener in terms of reagent consumption and size. This report introduces the WesTech EvenFlo™ feedwell design that addresses these issues.
Many thickeners suffer from short-circuiting and high floc consumption because of poor feedwell design as shown in Figure 1 below. The rotational flow in the feedwell is often carried into the body of the thickener and has the effect of “blowing out” on the side opposite to the feed entrance.
Figure 1: Bad distribution in a large thickener.
It also results in heavier solids settling out prematurely in one concentrated area causing torque spikes. The uneven flow means only a portion of the thickener is used for gravity separation and the type of turbulence in the thickener is not conducive to quiescent gravity settling. With a directional feed flow, flocculant mixing is not as efficient as there is no defined mixing or shear region to evenly disperse the flocculant. In addition, current feedwell designs are not conducive to feed turndown which can also adversely affect distribution.
Study of Typical Feedwell Types
Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) it is possible to compare the three most common feedwell configurations. The purpose is to note the differences in distribution patterns and to determine if the WesTech feedwell addresses the issues associated with short circuiting and inadequate flocculant mixing.
The Common Side Feed Feedwell
This is the most common feedwell design used in the industry today. The intent is for the angular momentum in the feed to carry the flow to the opposite side of the feedwell and then dissipate momentum as the material continues to swirl in the feedwell.
The Bottom Shelf Type Feedwell
A bottom shelf has been used in some thickeners in an effort to divert the downward momentum of the feed slurry
WesTech EvenFlo™ Feedwell
The EvenFlo™ feedwell provides energy dissipation as well as even distribution of the feed into the thickener. Feed enters the inner chamber which induces a head loss through a narrow opening to eliminate the rotational momentum of the feed. Flow from the inner chamber is directed to the bottom outer shelf in the feedwell and forces the feed to change direction a second time. The feed exits the feedwell in an evenly distributed flow pattern in the thickener. The EvenFlo™ feedwell design also provides even flow into the thickener tank through a wide range of feed flow rates. Feed flow variations only change the head level in the inner chamber while even flow distribution continues into the main portion of the feedwell and then into the thickener tank.
CFD Comparative Study
The three different feedwell configurations are studied side by side using the same flow rate and feedwell diameter. The distribution of solids becomes less concentric to feedwell for the side feed and bottom shelf designs. The EvenFlo design contains the velocity producing an even flow and uniform velocity in the feedwell.
With EvenFlo™, at 25 mm/sec, due to the concentric flow pattern and effectively using the entire volume of the thickener, suspended solids still have to move through an area of flow velocity less than 25 mm/sec. At 75 mm/sec there is a concentric flow pattern, thus no solids carry over at this flow velocity. At 150 mm/sec, the flow distribution is concentric to the feedwell and at 50 mm/sec, all the feed still contained in the feedwell.
The common side feedwell design shows a great tendency to short circuit and carry solids out the top of the thickener. Although the results are marginally better for the bottom shelf type feedwell the issue of rotational momentum being carried through to the body of the thickener is not addressed. The angular momentum is not effectively arrested. The EvenFlo™ feedwell achieves good feed distribution into the thickener tank. Figure 2 shows how the EvenFlo™ feedwell changes the feed rotational momentum to radial flow. The arrow shows the gap where the radial flow begins. It clearly shows rotational flow at the top and then radial flow after moving through the constriction. The arrow marks the constriction. Figure 3 shows the path lines and the intensity of flow.
Figure 2: Rotational momentum to radial flow.
Figure 3: EvenFlo™ energy dissipation.
CFD analyses of velocity profiles close to the effluent discharge around the perimeter of the clarifier confirm that EvenFlo™ velocities are very even and less than one-fifth the average of velocities from a conventional feedwell.
Confirmation of CFD Results
AMIRA independently analyzed the EvenFlo™ feedwell design and concluded the following:
• The EvenFlo™ feedwell offers a novel way to convert the feed rotational energy into a nearly radial flow
• Feedwell design achieves good momentum and energy dissipation
• Feedwell design consistently produces even discharge flow over a range of flow rates
• The solids and flocculant are well mixed and well dispersed within this zone
• The flocculant addition strategy is very effective
• Whether the creation of the recirculation or flocculating zone was intended in the feedwell design, but it was very effective.
Their model shows solids exiting the inner chamber where flocculent is added in a brief, high velocity region. Then flocs quickly grow in the main zone of the feedwell and then are evenly discharged.
Thickeners often require dilution of the feed to improve settling rates and floc consumption. Dilution systems that rely on specific gravity differential between the feed and supernatant are often limited. WesTech’s AirLift dilution system uses an airlift pump to draw clarified water evenly from the thickener surface into the feedwell. An even draw from multiple points prevents flow disturbances in the quiescent settling zone while ensuring proper dilution/ feed mixing inside the feedwell. Dilution flow can be regulated with precision by operator or automatic adjustment of the airflow to the system.
WesTech now has a number of EvenFlo™ feedwells installed or in various stages of production. WesTech’s EvenFlo™ design consists of a two-part feedwell system. An inner chamber converts the feed energy into a concentric radial flow. The main feedwell chamber then evenly distributes the feed into the sedimentation zone of the thickener. The WesTech EvenFlo™ feedwell provides the following benefits:
• Even feed distribution
• Optimal, controlled feed slurry dilution
• Minimized flocculent consumption
• Enhanced thickening
• Improved dewatering and underflow control.
The EvenFlo™ feedwell also prevents the following operating problems consistent with many thickeners:
• Clarity problems due to short circuiting
• High flocculent consumption
• Torque spikes due to uneven coarse-fraction deposits.